Some commentators say that Burgess in the novel is disagreeing with John Stuart Mill's principle of harm (that free will is allowable as long as it does no harm to others). Do you agree with this and what might the repercussions of such a stance be?
What role does religion play in the novel?
To what extent can we blame Alex's parents for the destruction that he wreaks throughout the book?
Does the introduction of Nadsat simply make the violence of the novel palatable?
To what extent is the novel a critique of cinema and its tendency to turn violence into a sensual pleasure?
